Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT determined classification of imported glucose monitoring devices under CTH 9027 80 90, affirming prior judicial precedents from Bayer Pharmaceuticals case and Bombay HC ruling. The tribunal upheld classification under scientific instrument heading, which qualifies for NIL Basic Customs Duty (BCD) under Notification No. 24/2005-Cus. The revenue's appeal was dismissed, confirming the concessional duty rate for goods classified under CTH 9027, distinguishing them from medical instruments under CTH 9018. The decision reinforces the specific tariff classification principles for medical diagnostic equipment, granting the appellant the benefit of zero customs duty based on the precise product categorization.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
