Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that set-off of permanent establishment (PE) loss against interest income is permissible under the tax treaty. The tribunal interpreted Article 11(2) as allowing computation of income per domestic law provisions, enabling inter-head loss adjustment. The assessee's claim of set-off was deemed valid, with the tribunal emphasizing that "gross" interest refers to income without expense deductions. Additionally, the tribunal recognized the alternative claim under Section 115A(1)(a)(iiaa), finding the external commercial borrowing (ECB) loans compliant with RBI regulations, thus qualifying for a concessional tax rate of 5% with applicable cess and surcharge.
ITAT held that set-off of permanent establishment (PE) loss against interest income is permissible under the tax treaty. The tribunal interpreted Article 11(2) as allowing computation of income per domestic law provisions, enabling inter-head loss adjustment. The assessee's claim of set-off was deemed valid, with the tribunal emphasizing that "gross" interest refers to income without expense deductions. Additionally, the tribunal recognized the alternative claim under Section 115A(1)(a)(iiaa), finding the external commercial borrowing (ECB) loans compliant with RBI regulations, thus qualifying for a concessional tax rate of 5% with applicable cess and surcharge.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.