Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
ITAT adjudicated a dispute concerning capital gains taxation involving a parent company's land sale to its 100% Indian subsidiary. The Tribunal rejected the AO's objection regarding new claims, relying on SC precedents in NTPC and Goetze (India) Ltd. cases. The Tribunal accepted the assessee's cross objection, holding that the capital gains from land transfer were not taxable under section 47(iv) of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal directed the AO to exclude the capital gains from taxable income, recompute total income, and refund taxes paid. Regarding interest, the Tribunal denied section 244A interest to the assessee due to delays attributable to the assessee's initial incorrect tax declaration, with a caveat that interest would be payable if the AO delays appeal effect beyond prescribed timelines.