Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
ITAT adjudicated a property investment dispute involving a co-owner with 50% share. The assessee demonstrated investment sources through housing loan from SBI and personal savings, substantiated by bank statements showing stamp duty payment of Rs. 3,27,525 and additional payments to developer. The Tribunal found the investment sources adequately explained and not previously verified by the Assessing Officer (AO). Consequently, the case was remanded to the AO for comprehensive verification of investment sources, with the assessee's appeal allowed for statistical purposes, directing a de novo examination of the financial documentation.