Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of HC affirmed ITAT's findings regarding development expenditures for land levelling, road construction, compound wall repair, and well restoration. The court validated the assessee's claims based on physical verification, contractor payment records, and tax deduction evidence. Contractors confirmed work completion and receipt of payments through proper channels. Brokerage expenses were also substantiated by broker's confirmation letter and purchaser's sworn statement. The HC found no grounds to interfere with ITAT's concurrent findings, answering all substantial questions of law in the assessee's favor and upholding the claimed development and brokerage expenses.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
