Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT ruled that seized documents from Micromax premises cannot be used against the assessee under Section 153A. The panchanama did not include the assessee's name, and the documents were found during an independent search of a third-party company. The Tribunal held that such documents can only be utilized under Section 153C after the AO records satisfaction that the documents relate to another person. The procedural requirement mandates a separate proceeding and independent satisfaction by the AO before initiating assessment. Consequently, the AO's assessment order was deemed improper, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
