Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT dismissed the insolvency application under Section 95 of IBC, finding the consent decree invalid as a guarantee instrument. The tribunal held that the decree lacked independent documentary evidence establishing voluntary personal guarantee, was obtained during a moratorium period, and was fundamentally vitiated by fraud among related parties. The court emphasized that a consent decree cannot create fresh legal obligations or serve as conclusive proof of debt, particularly when the guarantee was not properly invoked and the parties were interconnected through familial business relationships.
NCLAT dismissed the insolvency application under Section 95 of IBC, finding the consent decree invalid as a guarantee instrument. The tribunal held that the decree lacked independent documentary evidence establishing voluntary personal guarantee, was obtained during a moratorium period, and was fundamentally vitiated by fraud among related parties. The court emphasized that a consent decree cannot create fresh legal obligations or serve as conclusive proof of debt, particularly when the guarantee was not properly invoked and the parties were interconnected through familial business relationships.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.