Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of HC allowed the petitioner's challenge to tax demand notices under SVLDRS-3, finding the time limit provisions directive rather than mandatory. The court held that COVID-19 pandemic circumstances justified extending the scheme's deadline. Rejecting the respondents' rigid interpretation, the HC directed recalculation of tax liability, acceptance of delayed payment, and issuance of discharge certificate. The decision aligns with the scheme's objective of facilitating tax dispute resolution and providing relief during extraordinary circumstances. The court emphasized the scheme's intent to enable taxpayers to settle past central excise and service tax liabilities, particularly in light of the pandemic's economic challenges.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
