Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT ruled that payments made to Hemali Resorts by the buyer do not constitute consideration accruing to the assessee under Section 48. The tribunal found no evidence that the amounts were received by or legally accrued to the assessee. The payments were made directly to Hemali Resorts for pre-existing contractual obligations, and the transaction was conducted through banking channels with appropriate TDS. The PCIT's second invocation of Section 263 was deemed impermissible as it amounted to a mere change of opinion without presenting new material evidence. The assessee's appeal was consequently allowed, affirming that no tax leakage or prejudice to revenue existed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
