Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC dismisses input tax credit (ITC) claim, holding that the petitioner cannot claim ITC when the supplier failed to deposit mandatory tax under Section 16(2)(c). Despite various precedents cited, the court emphasized the clear statutory requirement of actual tax payment by the supplier to the government. The provision mandates that ITC eligibility is contingent upon the supplier's tax compliance, and in this case, Shree Radhey International neither deposited the tax nor maintained valid registration. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments and upheld the taxing authorities' decision, thereby dismissing the petition without any further interference.
HC dismisses input tax credit (ITC) claim, holding that the petitioner cannot claim ITC when the supplier failed to deposit mandatory tax under Section 16(2)(c). Despite various precedents cited, the court emphasized the clear statutory requirement of actual tax payment by the supplier to the government. The provision mandates that ITC eligibility is contingent upon the supplier's tax compliance, and in this case, Shree Radhey International neither deposited the tax nor maintained valid registration. The court rejected the petitioner's arguments and upheld the taxing authorities' decision, thereby dismissing the petition without any further interference.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
