Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT adjudicated a dispute regarding waste oil processing, determining that purification and reclamation processes do not constitute manufacturing. The tribunal held that filtration, distillation, and purification of waste oil do not create a new product with distinct characteristics. Consequently, such activities do not trigger excise duty liability under Central Excise law. Referencing prior judicial precedents, the tribunal concluded that waste oil processing remains non-dutiable. The impugned orders were set aside, and appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant in alignment with established legal principles governing industrial waste oil transformation processes.
CESTAT adjudicated a dispute regarding waste oil processing, determining that purification and reclamation processes do not constitute manufacturing. The tribunal held that filtration, distillation, and purification of waste oil do not create a new product with distinct characteristics. Consequently, such activities do not trigger excise duty liability under Central Excise law. Referencing prior judicial precedents, the tribunal concluded that waste oil processing remains non-dutiable. The impugned orders were set aside, and appeals were allowed, providing consequential relief to the appellant in alignment with established legal principles governing industrial waste oil transformation processes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
