Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that revisionary proceedings under Section 263 cannot be initiated for matters already considered and decided in appeal by CIT(A). In this case, the alleged bogus share capital was deemed genuine by CIT(A), thus precluding further revisional action. Relying on precedent from Bombay HC in Slum Rehabilitation Authority, the Tribunal applied the doctrine of merger, which prevents reassessment of issues already adjudicated in appellate proceedings. The PCIT's attempt to reopen the assessment was deemed improper, as the original assessment order had merged with CIT(A)'s order. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the revisionary proceedings.
ITAT held that revisionary proceedings under Section 263 cannot be initiated for matters already considered and decided in appeal by CIT(A). In this case, the alleged bogus share capital was deemed genuine by CIT(A), thus precluding further revisional action. Relying on precedent from Bombay HC in Slum Rehabilitation Authority, the Tribunal applied the doctrine of merger, which prevents reassessment of issues already adjudicated in appellate proceedings. The PCIT's attempt to reopen the assessment was deemed improper, as the original assessment order had merged with CIT(A)'s order. Consequently, the assessee's appeal was allowed, effectively nullifying the revisionary proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
