Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC held that appellant's purchase of shares in M/s Vardhman Polytex Ltd constituted stock-in-trade rather than investment, based on evidence of repeated sales and intention to trade. The court determined that interest paid on borrowed funds for share acquisition under Section 36(1)(iii) was deductible. The substantial legal questions were resolved in favor of the appellant-assessee, rejecting the revenue department's contrary position and affirming the characterization of shares as trading inventory.
HC held that appellant's purchase of shares in M/s Vardhman Polytex Ltd constituted stock-in-trade rather than investment, based on evidence of repeated sales and intention to trade. The court determined that interest paid on borrowed funds for share acquisition under Section 36(1)(iii) was deductible. The substantial legal questions were resolved in favor of the appellant-assessee, rejecting the revenue department's contrary position and affirming the characterization of shares as trading inventory.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.