Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT found the penalty proceedings under section 270A invalid due to procedural deficiencies. The AO failed to specifically identify the precise misreporting clause and did not substantiate the grounds for penalty imposition. The tribunal emphasized that penalty proceedings are discretionary, requiring strict adherence to statutory conditions. The AO did not demonstrate which specific actions constituted misreporting under section 270A(9). Following judicial precedent, the tribunal held that without clear causation and precise specification of misreporting, the penalty order cannot be sustained. Consequently, the tribunal deleted the penalty and allowed the assessee's appeal, underscoring the revenue's burden to prove statutory default within explicit legal parameters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
