Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC dismisses petitioner's challenge to GST notification regarding tax recovery and development agreement. The court held that transfer of development rights is amenable to GST, and the petitioner cannot claim exemption since consideration was received before completion certificate. The court found no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularities. The state's contention that construction services are liable for GST under reverse charge mechanism was upheld. The writ application was dismissed, confirming the tax liability for the financial year 2018-19 and extending the recovery time limit until 31.03.2024.
HC dismisses petitioner's challenge to GST notification regarding tax recovery and development agreement. The court held that transfer of development rights is amenable to GST, and the petitioner cannot claim exemption since consideration was received before completion certificate. The court found no violation of natural justice or procedural irregularities. The state's contention that construction services are liable for GST under reverse charge mechanism was upheld. The writ application was dismissed, confirming the tax liability for the financial year 2018-19 and extending the recovery time limit until 31.03.2024.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
