Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT allowed appellant's refund claim for service tax paid under mistake of law. The tribunal found that service recipient had deducted 50% service tax from appellant's running bill, and the activity was not liable for service tax. Work orders substantiated appellant's claim. The tribunal determined appellant is entitled to full refund with interest at 12% as Section 11B and 11BB provisions were inapplicable. Cross objections by revenue were rejected as contrary to legal principles. The decision affirms refund rights when tax is erroneously paid, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax adjudication.
CESTAT allowed appellant's refund claim for service tax paid under mistake of law. The tribunal found that service recipient had deducted 50% service tax from appellant's running bill, and the activity was not liable for service tax. Work orders substantiated appellant's claim. The tribunal determined appellant is entitled to full refund with interest at 12% as Section 11B and 11BB provisions were inapplicable. Cross objections by revenue were rejected as contrary to legal principles. The decision affirms refund rights when tax is erroneously paid, emphasizing procedural fairness in tax adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
