Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT partially allowed the appeal concerning service tax liability for a cable operator. The tribunal held that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked, and the demand should be restricted to the normal limitation period. The matter was remanded to the Original Authority for quantum determination of taxes for the standard period. While rejecting CENVAT credit claims, the tribunal directed the Adjudicating Authority to evaluate credit documentation against prescribed Rule 4(7) conditions during remand proceedings. The decision affirmed that local cable operators are independently liable for service tax, subject to threshold exemptions and compliance with regulatory requirements.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
