Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the Assessing Officer's addition of Rs. 9 lakhs unwarranted. The tribunal determined that the amount received by the assessee as a loan against fixed deposit cannot be considered business income. Since the assessee had already declared income under the Income Tax Declaration Scheme for AY 2013-14 and opted for taxation under Section 44AD, the addition was unjustified. The tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority's order and directed deletion of the disputed addition.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, finding the Assessing Officer's addition of Rs. 9 lakhs unwarranted. The tribunal determined that the amount received by the assessee as a loan against fixed deposit cannot be considered business income. Since the assessee had already declared income under the Income Tax Declaration Scheme for AY 2013-14 and opted for taxation under Section 44AD, the addition was unjustified. The tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority's order and directed deletion of the disputed addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
