Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the assessee's subscription scheme "Kuber Dhanvarsha" involving deposits ranging from Rs. 1,250 to Rs. 10,000 was fraudulent. The tribunal found the depositor addresses cryptic and unverifiable, with no genuine intention to return funds. The deposits were characterized as income under Section 28, not Section 68, due to lack of depositor genuineness proof. The tribunal concluded the scheme was designed to defraud innocent depositors, and the entire deposit collection constitutes taxable ill-gotten income. Consequently, the ITAT sustained the tax authorities' proposed additions and dismissed the assessee's appeal.
ITAT held that the assessee's subscription scheme "Kuber Dhanvarsha" involving deposits ranging from Rs. 1,250 to Rs. 10,000 was fraudulent. The tribunal found the depositor addresses cryptic and unverifiable, with no genuine intention to return funds. The deposits were characterized as income under Section 28, not Section 68, due to lack of depositor genuineness proof. The tribunal concluded the scheme was designed to defraud innocent depositors, and the entire deposit collection constitutes taxable ill-gotten income. Consequently, the ITAT sustained the tax authorities' proposed additions and dismissed the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
