Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
NCLAT applied the doctrine of priority under Section 48 of TP Act, affirming UCO Bank Consortium's first pari-passu charge over the Corporate Debtor's movable assets. The Tribunal rejected the Respondent's claim based on ROC registration, determining that the 8th Supplemental Deed of Working Capital Consortium Agreement established UCO Bank Consortium's priority. Referencing precedents including J.M. Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd case, the Tribunal held that only one secured creditor can enforce realization rights, and the Respondent failed to sufficiently identify charged assets under Section 52 of the Code. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant.
NCLAT applied the doctrine of priority under Section 48 of TP Act, affirming UCO Bank Consortium's first pari-passu charge over the Corporate Debtor's movable assets. The Tribunal rejected the Respondent's claim based on ROC registration, determining that the 8th Supplemental Deed of Working Capital Consortium Agreement established UCO Bank Consortium's priority. Referencing precedents including J.M. Financial Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd case, the Tribunal held that only one secured creditor can enforce realization rights, and the Respondent failed to sufficiently identify charged assets under Section 52 of the Code. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
