Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of CESTAT determined that imported ATM monitors are classifiable under CTH 8473 as parts of ATMs, not CTH 8528 as general monitors. The tribunal applied Clause 2(b) classification criteria, recognizing these monitors as specifically designed and principally used with ATM machines. Since the monitors are integral parts of ATMs and not excluded under Note 1, they should be classified under the same heading as ATM machinery (CTH 8472). The revenue's attempt to classify them under a residual entry was rejected. The appellate order set aside the previous classification, allowing the appeal and confirming classification under CTH 8473.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
