Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
HC held that under the unamended Section 3(12) of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, imposing interest, penalty, and redemption fine on IGST was without legal authority. Following the precedent in Mahindra & Mahindra Limited, the court quashed the impugned order levying interest and penalties. The amendment to Section 3(12) by Finance Act, 2024 is prospective, applicable only from 16th August, 2024. Additionally, a trade notice allowed regularization of imports under Advance Authorization Scheme that could not meet pre-import conditions, further supporting the court's decision to set aside confiscation and redemption fine. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.