Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The AAR determined that the contract for installing terminals linking Western and Southern regions constitutes a composite works contract under Section 2(119) of CGST Act. The services involving transportation, freight, and insurance are inextricably linked to the overall project execution. The entire contract spans five segments but fundamentally aims to commission immovable property. Consequently, the services are classified under 'Construction Services' (SAC 9954) and attract 18% GST, negating any potential exemption claims. The ruling emphasizes the interconnected nature of the contract's components, treating transportation and related services as integral to the comprehensive works contract rather than standalone services.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
