Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
The AT dismissed the appeal challenging an investigation under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Despite the appellant's argument that the predicate offence agency failed to file a charge sheet for over 9 years, the Tribunal found no delay on the respondent's part, as the ECIR was properly recorded following an FIR registered on 14.12.2016 for offences under Sections 409, 420, 120-B IPC read with Sections 7 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Tribunal declined to comment on the predicate agency's alleged delay as they were not a party to the proceedings, and the appellant failed to cite any legal provision or precedent establishing how such delay would affect PMLA proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.