Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT remanded a case concerning refusal to amend shipping bills under s.149 of Customs Act, 1962. The appellant sought amendments to include revised values, claiming they had documentary evidence existing at the time of export to justify the changes. The Tribunal clarified that while amendments aren't permitted as a matter of course, authorities have discretion when supported by contemporaneous documentary evidence. The appellant's request aimed to facilitate receipt of differential payments through proper channels. CESTAT directed the original authority to re-examine the documents with reasons for acceptance or rejection, while providing the appellant an opportunity of hearing before concluding the remand proceedings.
CESTAT remanded a case concerning refusal to amend shipping bills under s.149 of Customs Act, 1962. The appellant sought amendments to include revised values, claiming they had documentary evidence existing at the time of export to justify the changes. The Tribunal clarified that while amendments aren't permitted as a matter of course, authorities have discretion when supported by contemporaneous documentary evidence. The appellant's request aimed to facilitate receipt of differential payments through proper channels. CESTAT directed the original authority to re-examine the documents with reasons for acceptance or rejection, while providing the appellant an opportunity of hearing before concluding the remand proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
