TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT upheld additions under section 56(2)(x) based on the difference between the actual purchase price (38,44,884) and property valuation. The Tribunal found no reason to doubt the District Valuation Officer's assessment (42,51,700), noting it was significantly below the registration value (60,15,959). The appellant failed to provide valid evidence supporting their claimed purchase price. The burden of proof rested with the appellant to establish the accuracy of the sale deed value, which they failed to discharge. The ITAT dismissed the appeal, finding no infirmity in the orders passed by the AO and CIT(A).
TaxTMI 
