Personal liberty safeguards restrict arrest after court-directed GST appearance, requiring interim release where authorities overreach pending proceed...
Alternative statutory remedy and delay bar GST writ challenges despite pending rectification, while distinct subject matter permits parallel proceedin...
Unverified Insight Portal Information Cannot Justify Reassessment Without a Verified Taxpayer-Specific Income-Escape Nexus or Demonstrated Application...
Assessing Officer jurisdiction after statutory transfer invalidates reassessment notices issued by transferor officers and nullifies resulting proceed...
Consequential appeal-effect orders must implement rectification deleting working-capital adjustments and reconsider the resulting arm's-length range c...
Discounted cash flow valuation protects share premium where projections are reasonable, while audited book expenses defeat unexplained-expenditure add...
The AAR ruled that the applicant, who coordinates on-the-job training programs between universities and industry partners, acts as a "pure agent" under Rule 33 regarding stipend payments to trainees. The applicant functions merely as a conduit, receiving stipend amounts from industry partners and disbursing them in full to trainees without deductions. The AAR determined that the applicant satisfies all conditions of a pure agent, as it merely facilitates the payment process while the actual service is supplied by trainees to the industry partners. Consequently, the stipend amounts received by the applicant from industry partners and paid in full to trainees do not attract GST liability.
The AAR ruled that the applicant, who coordinates on-the-job training programs between universities and industry partners, acts as a "pure agent" under Rule 33 regarding stipend payments to trainees. The applicant functions merely as a conduit, receiving stipend amounts from industry partners and disbursing them in full to trainees without deductions. The AAR determined that the applicant satisfies all conditions of a pure agent, as it merely facilitates the payment process while the actual service is supplied by trainees to the industry partners. Consequently, the stipend amounts received by the applicant from industry partners and paid in full to trainees do not attract GST liability.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
