TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT ruled against treating lease deposits and booking advances as cessation of liability under Section 41(1) of Income Tax Act. The 3 crore lease deposit was temporary, interest-free security for a 21-year lease period, properly documented and acknowledged. The 2.20 crore booking advances (1.20 crore opening balance plus 1 crore received) were standard business transactions through banking channels. AO failed to establish basic conditions for Section 41(1) or Section 68 applicability, as transactions predated AY 2020-21. The tribunal upheld CIT(A)'s deletion of additions, noting that mere doubts about transaction genuineness without substantive evidence cannot trigger Section 41(1) or 68. Ruling favored assessee, confirming deposits and advances remained valid liabilities.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
