Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central Excise Act. Following Jharkhand HC's precedent in Rungta Mines Ltd case, tribunal affirmed that existing law prohibits cash refund of Cenvat Credit available on appointed date (01.07.2017). Appellant's failure to transition credit through proper channels and absence of export activities were fatal to refund claim. Tribunal held no legal provision exists under Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 for refunding balance credit, making refund claim legally untenable.
CESTAT dismissed appeal concerning refund claim of unutilized Cenvat Credit under s.142(3) of CGST Act, read with Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules and s.11B of Central Excise Act. Following Jharkhand HC's precedent in Rungta Mines Ltd case, tribunal affirmed that existing law prohibits cash refund of Cenvat Credit available on appointed date (01.07.2017). Appellant's failure to transition credit through proper channels and absence of export activities were fatal to refund claim. Tribunal held no legal provision exists under Cenvat Credit Rules 2004 for refunding balance credit, making refund claim legally untenable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
