Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Goods manufactured within Special Economic Zone (SEZ) were challenged regarding applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) and Additional Duty of Excise (AED). SC upheld that Section 3(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 does not extend to goods manufactured in SEZ. The principal ruling established that since the primary excise duty charge is not applicable to SEZ-manufactured goods, consequential additional duties including SAED (surcharge) and AED (cess) cannot be imposed. The territorial jurisdiction for excise duty purposes excludes SEZ areas, treating them distinct from domestic tariff territory. Appeal dismissed, confirming SEZ's exemption from these duties.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
