Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Dispute centered on Rule 21(8) of Punjab VAT Rules regarding input tax credit (ITC) calculations following tax rate reduction on iron and steel goods. SC upheld HC's ruling that Rule 21(8), introduced from 01.02.2014, could not be applied retroactively to reduce ITC on existing stock purchased at higher tax rates before the enabling provision in Punjab VAT Act came into effect on 01.04.2014. Following Eicher Motors precedent, SC affirmed that right to ITC accrues when tax is paid on inputs and cannot be diminished retroactively. Court emphasized that allowing retroactive application would cause prejudice to taxpayers who had legitimately claimed ITC at higher rates and could lead to revenue loss. Appeal dismissed, confirming that Rule 21(8) applies only to transactions from 01.04.2014 onwards.