TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of NCLAT dismissed appeal concerning operational creditor's Section 9 application under IBC. Court held that while Section 8 notice is mandatory prerequisite for filing Section 9 application, corporate debtor's failure to respond to Section 8 notice does not preclude them from contesting subsequent Section 9 proceedings. Operational creditor must deliver demand notice with invoice per Form 3, allowing corporate debtor 10 days to respond regarding disputes or prior payments. However, Section 8 and Section 9 serve distinct purposes - Section 8 establishes procedural requirement for operational creditor, while Section 9 provides corporate debtor full rights to defend against insolvency proceedings regardless of earlier response to Section 8 notice. Corporate debtor retains right to raise defenses during Section 9 proceedings despite non-reply to Section 8 notice.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
