Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT dismissed revenue's appeal concerning disputed long-term capital gains from penny stock transactions. While AO treated gains as unexplained cash credits under Section 68, assessee successfully demonstrated transaction legitimacy through comprehensive documentation including bank statements, contract notes, demat records and audited financials. Revenue failed to establish price manipulation or collusion with counterparties through direct evidence. Mere suspicion of accommodation entries in penny stocks insufficient to sustain addition without concrete proof rebutting assessee's evidence. CIT(A)'s deletion of addition upheld as assessee discharged onus of proving genuine nature of LTCG while revenue relied on generalized allegations without substantive material establishing non-genuineness.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
