Online bond platforms may offer overseas-regulated products and tax-specific bonds subject to disclosures, compliance safeguards and revised complianc...
Corporate guarantee valuation permits actual ascertainable commission while barring retroactive application and extended-period penalties for bona fid...
Proper-officer jurisdiction under UPGST penalty provisions upheld; participation on merits prevents bypassing the statutory appellate remedy through w...
Transitioned CENVAT credit may validly satisfy mandatory pre-deposit requirements for legacy service tax appeals through Electronic Credit Ledger debi...
Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
HC addressed maintainability of GST petition where appellant sought stay on tax recovery due to non-constitution of GST Tribunal. Following legislative amendment to Section 112 of CGST Act 2017, pre-deposit requirement was reduced from 20% to 10% for appeals. Despite Tribunal's non-existence, court granted interim relief based on precedent, allowing assessee to deposit 10% of disputed tax amount in addition to amount already deposited under Section 107(6). Court held that petitioner cannot be denied statutory benefit under Section 112(9) due to administrative delay in Tribunal formation. Recovery proceedings for balance amount stayed until Tribunal constitution and appeal filing. Petition disposed with direction to comply with modified deposit requirement.
HC addressed maintainability of GST petition where appellant sought stay on tax recovery due to non-constitution of GST Tribunal. Following legislative amendment to Section 112 of CGST Act 2017, pre-deposit requirement was reduced from 20% to 10% for appeals. Despite Tribunal's non-existence, court granted interim relief based on precedent, allowing assessee to deposit 10% of disputed tax amount in addition to amount already deposited under Section 107(6). Court held that petitioner cannot be denied statutory benefit under Section 112(9) due to administrative delay in Tribunal formation. Recovery proceedings for balance amount stayed until Tribunal constitution and appeal filing. Petition disposed with direction to comply with modified deposit requirement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
