Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC quashed and set aside order dated 24 January 2024 rejecting condonation application for delayed income tax return filing. Court found Additional CIT (OSD) (OT & WT) lacked authority to issue orders under s.119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, as this power vests with CBDT. While CBDT may allocate work among members, no evidence demonstrated valid delegation to Additional CIT. Matter remanded to CBDT or authorized member for fresh consideration with directions to hear petitioner and issue reasoned order within 3 months. Ruling clarified procedural requirements for exercising powers under s.119(2)(b), emphasizing proper authority and delegation channels.
HC quashed and set aside order dated 24 January 2024 rejecting condonation application for delayed income tax return filing. Court found Additional CIT (OSD) (OT & WT) lacked authority to issue orders under s.119(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, as this power vests with CBDT. While CBDT may allocate work among members, no evidence demonstrated valid delegation to Additional CIT. Matter remanded to CBDT or authorized member for fresh consideration with directions to hear petitioner and issue reasoned order within 3 months. Ruling clarified procedural requirements for exercising powers under s.119(2)(b), emphasizing proper authority and delegation channels.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
