Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC determined petitioner's case falls under "amount in arrears" category under SVLDRS, not "litigation" category, as no appeal was filed before 30.06.2019 against Order-in-original demanding Rs. 32,27,856/-. Designated committee's mechanical issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 without considering petitioner's reply demonstrated non-application of mind. Petitioner, having already deposited 60% of tax arrears (Rs. 31,32,551.60), is entitled to relief u/s 124 of SVLDRS. Court set aside committee's demand for higher amount and allowed petition, affirming petitioner's eligibility for reduced tax liability under scheme's provisions for arrears category.
HC determined petitioner's case falls under "amount in arrears" category under SVLDRS, not "litigation" category, as no appeal was filed before 30.06.2019 against Order-in-original demanding Rs. 32,27,856/-. Designated committee's mechanical issuance of Form SVLDRS-3 without considering petitioner's reply demonstrated non-application of mind. Petitioner, having already deposited 60% of tax arrears (Rs. 31,32,551.60), is entitled to relief u/s 124 of SVLDRS. Court set aside committee's demand for higher amount and allowed petition, affirming petitioner's eligibility for reduced tax liability under scheme's provisions for arrears category.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
