Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT set aside CIT(A)'s order regarding exemption u/s 10(26AAA) for Sikkimese individual's income. CIT(A) had deleted additions u/ss 69A and 69 based solely on identification certificate without following Rule 46A(3) of IT Rules, which requires AO verification. ITAT restored assessment proceedings before AO for fresh consideration, allowing assessee opportunity to present evidence supporting exemption claim. Both Revenue's counsel and assessee's representative agreed to this approach. Revenue's appeal allowed for statistical purposes. Matter remanded for verification of whether conditions u/s 10(26AAA) were fulfilled, ensuring procedural compliance and fair hearing.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
