Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT held that the respondent-importer had wrongly claimed a lower IGST rate on import of a Single Jersey Circular Knitting Machine, constituting suppression of facts. The extended period of limitation and penalties u/s 114A were rightly invoked, as there was no mala fide intent. The imported goods were liable for confiscation u/s 111(m), but no redemption fine was imposed since the goods were unavailable. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, upholding the demand for short-paid duty while setting aside the penalties.
The CESTAT held that the respondent-importer had wrongly claimed a lower IGST rate on import of a Single Jersey Circular Knitting Machine, constituting suppression of facts. The extended period of limitation and penalties u/s 114A were rightly invoked, as there was no mala fide intent. The imported goods were liable for confiscation u/s 111(m), but no redemption fine was imposed since the goods were unavailable. The Revenue's appeal was allowed, upholding the demand for short-paid duty while setting aside the penalties.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
