Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
Assessee partly succeeded. AO made addition u/s 69A r.w.s 115BBE treating bank deposits as unexplained money despite assessee providing details of fixed deposits, bank statements, investments from employment income except one entry of Rs. 63,133. ITAT held once source is explained with supporting evidence, mere doubting genuineness without basis is unjustified. Except Rs. 63,133, no addition u/s 69A can be made for explained credits. Decided in favour of assessee partly.