Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The HC held that the appellant could not be treated as permitted to pay tax on compounded basis u/s 7 of KGST Act. Despite applying for compounded tax, there was no express permission granted by the department within the stipulated period. The appellant's conduct showed intent to pay regular tax u/s 5, not compounded tax. As actual payment was u/s 5 during the assessment year, the appellant was entitled to the concessional tax rate announced for bar attached hotels. The department erred in accepting the compounding application post assessment year and completing assessment based on it.
The HC held that the appellant could not be treated as permitted to pay tax on compounded basis u/s 7 of KGST Act. Despite applying for compounded tax, there was no express permission granted by the department within the stipulated period. The appellant's conduct showed intent to pay regular tax u/s 5, not compounded tax. As actual payment was u/s 5 during the assessment year, the appellant was entitled to the concessional tax rate announced for bar attached hotels. The department erred in accepting the compounding application post assessment year and completing assessment based on it.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.