Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
The CESTAT held that Undenatured Ethyl Alcohol is not excisable. As the goods were non-excisable, they could not be considered exempt u/r 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules. Consequently, the Appellant was ineligible to claim credit and reversal of such inadmissible credit by payment did not entitle refund. The Appellant's refund claim was rejected as the goods were non-excisable.
The CESTAT held that Undenatured Ethyl Alcohol is not excisable. As the goods were non-excisable, they could not be considered exempt u/r 6(3) of CENVAT Credit Rules. Consequently, the Appellant was ineligible to claim credit and reversal of such inadmissible credit by payment did not entitle refund. The Appellant's refund claim was rejected as the goods were non-excisable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
