Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
HC dismissed civil revision u/s 86 of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. Exercising jurisdiction u/s 22A, HC held that as per Explanation II, "goods in transport" means goods handed over to carrier but not delivered. Since none of 5 consignees confirmed purchase and one filed complaint against petitioner, goods were in transit at time of seizure, covered u/s 22A. Proper documentation essential to avoid penalties. Civil revision dismissed.
HC dismissed civil revision u/s 86 of Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. Exercising jurisdiction u/s 22A, HC held that as per Explanation II, "goods in transport" means goods handed over to carrier but not delivered. Since none of 5 consignees confirmed purchase and one filed complaint against petitioner, goods were in transit at time of seizure, covered u/s 22A. Proper documentation essential to avoid penalties. Civil revision dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
