Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The CESTAT held that the imported health supplements are classifiable under CTH 2106 9099 and attract 18% IGST under Sr. No. 453 of Schedule III of Notification No. 1/2017-IGST rate, not 28% under Sr. No. 9 of Schedule IV. The goods were not protein concentrates or food flavouring materials. The demand for differential IGST was time-barred as there was no suppression of facts by the appellant. The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
