Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Incriminating documents seized during search were routine business records, not evidence of income suppression. Assessment u/s 153A invalid when regular assessment completed. Supreme Court's Abhisar Buildwell judgment relied upon. No violation of Section 47(xiii) provisos found - partners withdrew capital after reorganization, not as consideration for transfer. Madras High Court's CADD Centre judgment supported exemption u/s 47(xiii). Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside orders treating firm's assets/liabilities as taxable long-term capital gains u/s 45(4), allowing assessee's appeal.
Incriminating documents seized during search were routine business records, not evidence of income suppression. Assessment u/s 153A invalid when regular assessment completed. Supreme Court's Abhisar Buildwell judgment relied upon. No violation of Section 47(xiii) provisos found - partners withdrew capital after reorganization, not as consideration for transfer. Madras High Court's CADD Centre judgment supported exemption u/s 47(xiii). Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside orders treating firm's assets/liabilities as taxable long-term capital gains u/s 45(4), allowing assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
