Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Incriminating documents seized during search were routine business records, not evidence of income suppression. Assessment u/s 153A invalid when regular assessment completed. Supreme Court's Abhisar Buildwell judgment relied upon. No violation of Section 47(xiii) provisos found - partners withdrew capital after reorganization, not as consideration for transfer. Madras High Court's CADD Centre judgment supported exemption u/s 47(xiii). Income Tax Appellate Tribunal set aside orders treating firm's assets/liabilities as taxable long-term capital gains u/s 45(4), allowing assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.