Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Section 16(4) of the CGST Act imposes a time limit for claiming input tax credit (ITC), restricting it to the due date of filing the return for September following the relevant financial year or the annual return, whichever is earlier. This provision violates Article 14 of the Constitution by arbitrarily depriving taxpayers of their right to claim ITC despite having paid taxes to suppliers. The GST laws lack provisions for revising returns, compelling taxpayers to exercise caution in filing March returns to reconcile entries. Allowing returns with late fees but disallowing ITC amounts to double punishment. Late fees and interest already compensate the treasury and deter delays. Imposing double tax through Section 16(4) is arbitrary and capricious. As the Central Government proposes to amend Section 16 by introducing Section 118, removing the time limit condition, the Court allows the petitions without examining Section 16(4)'s constitutional validity.