Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Cancellation of GST registration - violation of Section 29(2)(a) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Respondent no. 2 is the proper authority to inquire about cancellation or suspension of GST registration and pass necessary orders. Although a notice might have been issued under an erroneous provision, petitioner no. 1 has liberty to reply, raise jurisdictional issues, and request amendments. Respondent no. 2 can initiate appropriate proceedings if petitioner no. 1 shows the provision invoked is incorrect. Only a show cause notice has been issued seeking clarification and documents from petitioner no. 1. Authorities must hear the party and pass orders per law. Premature for the High Court to interfere at this stage. Petition disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
