Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Customs broker's license revocation and security deposit forfeiture were challenged due to alleged involvement in fraudulent export activities. The allegations included failure to verify documents and identities, misuse of factory stuffing permission, document forgery to avail drawback and incentives fraudulently, and value inflation through document manipulation. The Tribunal held that there was no evidence of the broker's prior knowledge of non-existent exporters or being a beneficiary of wrongly received drawbacks. The modus operandi involved forged factory stuffing permissions and export invoices signed by Central Excise Officers. However, the Department failed to prove violations under relevant Customs Broker Licensing Regulations. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order confirming the violations and allowed the appeal.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
