Political contribution deductions require assessee-specific proof before cash-back allegations can justify disallowance or unexplained-money additions...
Television receivers and monitors imported by appellant were reclassified from declared tariff items to attract higher duty. Appellant contended monitors were usable as televisions based on opinion of third party, which is insufficient ground for reclassification as use cannot be sole criterion. Regarding assembled television sets, BIS certification requirement applies at point of sale, not import of knocked-down condition goods. No evidence of smuggling to invoke Section 123 presumption. Demand of duty and confiscation u/ss 28 and 111(d) unsustainable. Impugned order set aside by CESTAT, appeal allowed.
Television receivers and monitors imported by appellant were reclassified from declared tariff items to attract higher duty. Appellant contended monitors were usable as televisions based on opinion of third party, which is insufficient ground for reclassification as use cannot be sole criterion. Regarding assembled television sets, BIS certification requirement applies at point of sale, not import of knocked-down condition goods. No evidence of smuggling to invoke Section 123 presumption. Demand of duty and confiscation u/ss 28 and 111(d) unsustainable. Impugned order set aside by CESTAT, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
Join Channel 
