Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Writ petitions challenged the 4% withholding tax rate u/s 195 on receipts asserted as business income u/s 9(1)(i), despite the petitioner having withheld tax at 1.5%. The Court noted the profit attribution rate of 26% was not disputed and that a 1.04% withholding rate would correspond to this rate. As the withholding rate exceeding 1.04% was not seriously questioned, the Court found itself unable to sustain the 4% rate. The withholding tax rate for other years would be decided independently. Since the orders were limited to adjudication u/s 197, all rights and contentions on merits are kept open for regular assessment proceedings.
Writ petitions challenged the 4% withholding tax rate u/s 195 on receipts asserted as business income u/s 9(1)(i), despite the petitioner having withheld tax at 1.5%. The Court noted the profit attribution rate of 26% was not disputed and that a 1.04% withholding rate would correspond to this rate. As the withholding rate exceeding 1.04% was not seriously questioned, the Court found itself unable to sustain the 4% rate. The withholding tax rate for other years would be decided independently. Since the orders were limited to adjudication u/s 197, all rights and contentions on merits are kept open for regular assessment proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
