Just a moment...
We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:
1. Basic
• Quick overview summary answering your query with references
• Category-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI
2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
• Detailed report covering:
- Overview Summary
- Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
- Relevant Case Laws
- Tariff / Classification / HSN
- Expert views from TaxTMI
- Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy
• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.
Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:
Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
From the plain reading of section 167B, the taxability of an AOP is based on whether the members' shares are determinate or indeterminate. When indeterminate, tax is charged at the Maximum Marginal Rate (MMR) or higher if a member's income is taxable at a higher rate than MMR. MMR is the highest income tax rate applicable to individuals, AOPs or BOIs. In this case, the AOP stated members' shares as determinate (TPL 99.99%, Chint 0.01%) in its ITR. TPL is a domestic company taxable at MMR (30%), while Chint, a foreign company, is taxable at a higher rate (40%). The Tribunal opined that Chint's share (0.01%) should be taxed at 40% plus surcharges/cesses, and TPL's share (99.99%) at 30% plus surcharges/cesses. The interest levied u/ss 234A, 234B and 234C was upheld. The Tribunal's decision was based on the precedent of Herve Pomerleau International CCCL Joint Venture.